admin No Comments

Investment Playbook for the Second Half of 2019

I think you’ll be pleasantly surprised when you look at your quarterly performance reports, especially after a difficult 2018, and particularly challenging 4th quarter in which the markets dropped almost 20% from their highs. Before I go any further, I want to commend you, my clients for remaining invested and calm even when the headlines have made it excruciatingly difficult to do so. Not one of you called me to express concern or suggest we sell and hide in cash, succumbing to the negative headlines about trade tariffs with Mexico and China. I am sensitive to how hard you’ve all worked over your careers to accumulate the wealth you entrust me to manage, and each day when I go to the office, I am humbled to have the privilege to serve you as your fiduciary advisor.

With that, I’m happy to report that the first six months provided incredible market returns, with the major averages, the S&P 500, Dow Jones Industrial Average and Nasdaq Composite returning 18.54%, 15.4% and 20.66% respectively. But recession risk is indeed rising, and the overall data suggests a synchronized global deceleration in growth is already well underway.

As of July, the current economic expansion has entered its 120th month, now tied with the 1991-2001 period for the longest economic expansion in the post WWII modern era. While the saying goes, “bull markets don’t die of old age,” we still need to be cognizant of how much the markets have already run this year and in the 10 years prior. 

Over the past 10 years, the S&P 500 has produced astounding annualized returns of 14.43% per year, a whopping 285% total return, while the historical average annualized total return for the S&P 500 index over the past 90 years is 10%. This difference of +4.5% annually over the past 10 years provides some context as to why many of the largest financial firms from Vanguard to Blackrock to JP Morgan are forecasting low to mid-single digit returns for US stocks over the next decade.    

Given the low forward looking return expectations for stocks and bonds, you may be tempted to suggest that it’s come time to pull some chips off the table, perhaps move a portion of your investable assets to cash which is currently offering ~2%, (a real rate of 0% after factoring in inflation).  Over the past 10 years, since the lows of 2009 we have had many occasions when one could rationalize selling stocks and raising cash—I can recall at least half a dozen times—but each time you would have been making a costly mistake as markets continued to soar and make new all-time highs.

With the IMF issuing a recent report cutting its outlook for Global Economic Growth from a level that was already the lowest since the financial crisis of 2008-09, and several of my recession checklist items flashing warning signals including: an inverted yield curve, IPO Market Boom, ISM index weakest reading in 3 years, defensive stocks/sectors outperforming, and extreme reading in bullish sentiment/investor optimism, now is the opportune time to adjust client portfolios for inclement weather ahead. Which is why I’ve prepared an investment playbook for the 2nd half of 2019 and beyond, that I’m excited to share with you below. 

  1. Favor Large over Small Cap Stocks this late in the economic expansion

Weakness in the Russell 2000 (Small Cap Index) has taken it to the lowest level versus the S&P 500 since 2016, and sits precariously close to the lowest level since 2009. According to Ned Davis Research, weakness of small cap stocks has preceded broader market sell-offs in the past, and can be a recession warning.

From the chart below, you can see that small caps typically have their best relative performance early in an economic expansion. That is because smaller companies are generally more vulnerable to economic cycles, as they tend to hold more debt than their large-cap peers, making them especially sensitive to rising interest rates and wage inflation. 

2. Favor asset classes that historically provided positive annualized returns in a recession 

The asset classes historically producing positive annualized returns during a recession are: Gold, US Dollar, Cash, Investment Grade Bonds, Government Bonds, Dividend Aristocrats, and Volatility.

Furthermore, our defensive positioning in stock market strategies hasn’t weighed on portfolio returns over the past few years.  Our sizable position in the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF Strategy (Figure 1) has outperformed the S&P 500 in 2016, 2017, 2018 and thus far in 2019 while carrying a lower Beta and Standard Deviation, two of the most common measures of investment risk.  

Add to this our sizable position in the iShares Minimum Volatility ETF Strategy (Figure 2) which has outperformed the S&P 500 over a very strong 5-year period all while doing so with a substantially lower beta and standard deviation.


We will continue to favor these dividend appreciation, quality and low volatility strategies which historically fare better during recessions.  Ironically, they also perform well during strong bull markets—go figure! In this vane we also want to favor buying defensive stocks over cyclical stocks. Cyclical stocks that typically are tied to economic growth have failed to regain the ground lost in May, whereas defensive groups like consumer staples and utilities have confirmed the S&P 500′s new highs. In fact, the S&P 500 consumer discretionary sector has consistently lagged the S&P 500 consumer staples sector ever since October 2018.

3. Focus on investments in Quads 3 and 4 (Figure 3) 



4. Keep Bond Duration (length) Short/Intermediate

In all my client portfolios from the most conservative to the most aggressive, we maintain a position in bonds for a number of reasons. Bonds, especially Treasuries historically have been negatively correlated to the performance and directionality of stocks. When major stock indexes drop 10, 20, 30%, and panic ensues, you can count on your US Treasuries to preserve principal and provide a modest income stream which given where rates are now, should meet inflation and allow you to maintain your purchasing power. Admittedly, not exciting stuff, but absolutely necessary if you’re nearing retirement and need to preserve the wealth you’ve built to get you through your retirement years.

With long term bonds currently offering lower rates than short term bonds, a trend that’s lasted for over 3 months (or one quarter), one of the clearest signals of a coming recession in the next 9 to 18 months has been triggered, the inverted yield curve. According to Campbell Harvey, a Duke University finance professor whose research in the 1980s first linked yield curve inversions to recessions, an inverted yield curve has been associated with predicting a recession for the last seven recessions.” “From the 1960s, this indicator has been reliable in terms of foretelling a recession, and also importantly, it has not given any false signals yet.”  

5. Don’t follow the herd—BE DIFFERENT (My Clients Certainly Are)!  

The famed Chief Investment Officer of the Yale Endowment David Swenson is quoted saying, “in order to outperform other people you have to do something different.” While I’m sure this statement doesn’t come as a surprise to you, most investors do not take the steps necessary to increase their odds of outperforming others, especially those that fully automate their investment management or implement a 100% passive strategy.

In my experience over the last decade, I’ve found it takes hard work, a calculated and tested process, solid understanding of the economy and capital markets, and last but not least, humility, to build a sustainable investment management strategy. I strongly believe Robo Advisors are not an effective investment management strategy for all market environments. For example, at the beginning of an economic expansion, you’d want to increase exposure to Small Cap Companies to enhance overall portfolio returns.  While in the later stages of a bull market, you’d want to emphasize dividend appreciation, quality, and defensive sectors, factors that historically perform better than owning a passive S&P 500 index fund. This is where Robo Advisors fall short.  They are not tactical or flexible when they should be. They don’t take into consideration where we are in the economic cycle. Which is why many of the investors I speak to and eventually work with are skeptical of relying entirely on such products to manage their hard-earned money.

As always, please let me know if you have any questions, and I look forward to scheduling our quarterly review meeting.

Warmest Regards,

Aaron L Hattenbach, AIF®

Managing Member

Rapport Financial 

2 Embarcadero Center 8th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111

(310)383-6204

[email protected]


The opinions expressed herein are those of Rapport Financial, LLC (RF) and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not a guarantee or indicator of future results. Consider the investment objectives, risks and expenses before investing.  You should not consider the information in this letter as a recommendation to buy or sell any particular security and should not be considered as investment advice of any kind. You should not assume that any of the securities discussed in this report are or will be profitable, or that recommendations we make in the future will be profitable or equal the performance of the securities listed in this newsletter. These securities may not be in an account’s portfolio by the time this report is received, or may have been repurchased for an account’s portfolio. These securities do not represent an entire account’s portfolio and may represent only a small percentage of the account’s portfolio. partners, employees or their family members may have a position in securities mentioned herein.  Rapport Financial was established in 2017 and is registered under the Investment Advisors Act of 1940. Additional information about RF can be found in our Form ADV.

admin No Comments

Market Insights Second Quarter 2017

Strong Economic Data—However Brace for a Pullback in the Second Half of 2017

I’m beginning this economic commentary with the chart below from JP Morgan Private Bank’s Q2 insights presentation. The upper half of the chart identifies pullbacks during the current market cycle from 2010-present.

A FEW IMPORTANT TAKEAWAYS FROM THIS CHART:

  • The last time we had a peak (top) to trough (bottom) correction in the S&P 500 greater than 10% was nearly 18 months ago driven by fears of a slowdown in China and weaker oil prices.
  • In every calendar year since the great recession of 2008-09 (2010-2016) there’s been a healthy pullback in the markets greater than 5%. 2017 is the lone exception.
  • 4 of 7 corrections were greater than 10%.

The markets have been remarkably resilient and immune to bad news. Each 1-2% correction has been met with opportunistic investors eager to “buy the dip” and put money to work at lower prices.


THE ECONOMY

If you look a little deeper we see the following:

  • The U.S. has added jobs every month since October 2010, a record 81 month stretch that has resulted in roughly 16 million jobs and slowly repaired much of the damage inflicted from the 2008-09 recession.
  • Employers added 222k jobs in June and the unemployment rate ticked up to 4.4% with more people joining the labor force.
  • US Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) reading for June came in at 57.8, its highest level since August 2014. A number above 50 indicates an expansion in manufacturing activity.

STRONG ECONOMIC DATA, NOT WITHOUT RISK

While friends, family and clients would generally describe me as an optimist— the optimist in me is growing concerned with complacency forming in the markets. The current bull market that began in 2009 is now the second longest in history and 24 months away from being the longest ever! Valuations are high, balance sheets are levered, and the Federal Reserve is raising rates. I’d say given this mix of factors, you’d be wise to temper your expectations and not expect the double-digit annualized returns we’ve experienced since the financial crisis.

Central bank easy monetary policies have had arguably the greatest impact on this bull market in stocks globally. As you can see from the chart below courtesy of Bank of America Merrill Lynch, the S&P 500 has risen roughly in tandem with increases in central bank balance sheets during the past 9 years. With the Fed signaling it will begin to reduce its balance sheet, and the European Central Bank likely to end its quantitative easing program by the end of 2018, growth in central bank assets is likely to decelerate next year and turn negative in 2019. This could also weigh on future returns in developed market stocks.


There are several risks with the greatest potential to derail the 8 year bull market run:

1. Subprime Auto Loans-38% of new car loans have negative equity rolled into the loans. And lenders like Banco Santander aren’t verifying income or job histories. Sound eerily familiar? Auto financing is a $1.2 trillion market. I’d track down a list of the largest auto lenders and identify the lenders issuing the highest volume of subprime loans, that is, to borrowers with lower than average credit scores.

2. S&P 500 valuation getting extended. The Shiller P/E ratio is currently at 30.12, which puts the figure at its 2nd highest level in history! Stock market capitalizations as a percent of the US Gross Domestic Product (GDP) stands at 130%, close to peak levels.

3. Low volatility encouraging excessive risk taking through the use of leverage. Historically, during periods of extended low volatility, investors increase leverage by effectively borrowing to increase the size of their bets.

4. Exponential growth in popularity of passive market cap weighted index fund investment strategies. The proliferation of passive index investing has rewarded investors over this 8 year bull market expansion with double-digit annualized market returns and low fees. However, investors need to understand that these are bull market strategies that offer no downside protection.

THE #1 RISK TO INVESTORS: Formation of a Bubble in Passive Investing

Whether you invest through a registered investment advisor, robo advisor, company 401k plan, or happen to be a “do it yourself investor,” it is likely that you have a portion of your assets in what are called “passive investment strategies” designed to track an index like the S&P 500. These passive investment strategies, taking the form of a mutual fund or exchange traded fund (ETF) are now the most popular form of investing for both small and large investors.

“Through the first five months of this year, investors put $338 billion into passive mutual funds and ETFs—that’s on top of last year’s record inflows of $506 billion, according to Morningstar. If this pace keeps up, passive funds could take in more than $800 billion in 2017, a 60% jump from 2016’s record and nearly double the assets from 2015!”

Record inflows into passive investment strategies are also happening as investors abandon actively managed strategies that have failed to outperform their indexes and come with higher fees. In fact, new data confirms passive investment strategies are actually beating 82% of all active funds after fees.

As a result, once industry powerhouses known for their actively managed mutual funds, T. Rowe Price and Franklin Templeton have been replaced by the new 800lb gorillas in asset management and early adopters of passive ETF investing: Blackrock and Vanguard, the two largest asset managers in the world according to the Top 400 Asset Managers of 2017.  See the chart below which shows this trend taking place over the past decade.


I am admittedly a strong proponent of the low-cost and market exposure offered by passively managed index tracking strategies. The ability to hold an investment that gives you exposure to 500 of the largest companies in the United States for a fee as low as 0.04%–that’s right, 40 cents on every $1,000 invested is absolutely brilliant and arguably the greatest invention in modern finance. But in an aging bull market, it is important you recognize that these funds are designed precisely to match the return of the index and therefore offer no downside protection. Furthermore, when you buy a market cap weighted index fund like the Vanguard S&P 500 Index Mutual Fund, you’re effectively buying all the stocks in the index—whether they’re cheap or expensive. So, as more money pours into a passive fund like the one above designed to track the S&P 500 index, it must buy stocks in the same proportion as the index it tracks—with no regard for stock price or fundamentals. The effect is that the largest companies become larger, riskier, and more important in determining the overall direction and performance of the index.

Which brings me to the issue at hand: elevated valuations on the largest companies. If you rely exclusively on passive market cap weighted index investment strategies you could be paying prices for stocks that are at or near peak levels. And paying prices that are too high is the single greatest risk to an investor according to one of the greatest investors of all time, Howard Marks of Oaktree Capital.

The best illustration of this elevated price risk can be seen by looking at the 5 largest companies by market capitalization (still publicly traded) in the Nasdaq 100 index during the tech boom and subsequent bust of the late 1990s-early 2000s. 4 of the 5 companies listed below are still recovering losses in market capitalization from their peak in 2000. And if you had the great misfortune of purchasing the Nasdaq 100 index fund at the peak of the market in 2000, you had to wait until September 30, 2016 to get back to even! That’s an astounding 16+ years of no returns!

Source: Yahoo Finance


Again, I’m increasingly becoming concerned about the enormous amount of money flowing into passive market cap index funds which is making large companies even larger and no longer reasonable on a fundamental basis. Technology stocks now make up over 58.32% of the Nasdaq 100, not far from their high of 64.9% in 2000. By many measures technology stocks have gotten expensive. Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Facebook and Alphabet (Google) make up over 42.28% of the Nasdaq 100 index. These same 5 companies now constitute 12.36% of the S&P 500 index, and were responsible for 58% of the index’s 2017 advance through late May! When volatility and fear re-emerge from a long slumber, investors will, like they have time and again during previous downturns, sell what they own in their investment accounts, which for many investors includes these passive market cap index ETFs and mutual funds. Top heavy indexes like the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 will get absolutely clobbered and companies with the largest weights will suffer sharp declines.

While I’m likely calling this bubble in passive market cap index investing a bit too early, I’d rather forgo a few percentage points of upside to be protected when markets inevitably do correct. The alternative isn’t necessarily using an expensive active manager, that often (but not always) statistically provides lackluster performance. Instead, there are strategies designed with factors not limiting them to the restrictions imposed by strict index funds. If you’d like to learn about some of these alternative investment strategies or are interested in scheduling a complimentary portfolio review, feel free to book time on my calendar: http://rapportfinancial.com/contact.

I’ll conclude this commentary with a reminder to review your asset allocation—being the mix of stocks, bonds and cash held in your investment portfolio. Start by comparing your initial asset allocation from when you first put together your portfolio to how the allocation looks today. For my current clients, this is an exercise we conduct quarterly to ensure the portfolio is aligned with their risk tolerance, time horizon, and investment goals. It’s likely after this long bull market run that the percentage mix of assets in your portfolio is now different, and you may be taking on more risk than you can stomach when the next major correction hits.

I’ll sign off with my favorite quote and let you determine where you think we are in this market cycle:

“Bull markets are born on pessimism, grow on skepticism, mature on optimism, and die on Euphoria.”    –Sir John Templeton


My gut tells me we’re in the “mature on optimism” phase.

 

Aaron L. Hattenbach, AIF®
Managing Member
Rapport Financial
[email protected]
www.rapportfinancial.com

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT A GUARANTEE OF FUTURE RESULTS. This market commentary is a matter of opinion and is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as investment advice and does not address or account for individual investor circumstances. Investment decisions should always be made based on the client’s specific financial needs and objectives, goals, time horizon and risk tolerance. The statements contained herein are based solely upon the opinions of Rapport Financial. All opinions and views constitute our judgments as of the date of writing and are subject to change at any time without notice. Information was obtained from third-party sources, which we believe to be reliable, but not guaranteed.